Phase 2 – 15 Marks in total (10- Presentation, 5 – Review)
In addition to the course booklet, this year, I have added a few more rules, here they go.
- Develop a critique using your personal lens, well informed of other critiques about the project you have selected.
- It is highly recommended that you find several books / critiques on your project. Online sources are shallow. Written critique is enriching. Name your sources on the last slide.
- Develop a pdf that will contain 20 slides, 20 seconds each. The pdf itself will mainly be images / info graphics with little / no text.
- You have to present in English.
- You cannot read from the screen.. so you will / can hand handheld notes for each slide, study cards are highly recommended.
- 5 days prior to the actual presentation, you will review your critique / take on the project with a one on one meeting with your instructor. (5 marks)
- Set a personal time – about 20 minutes to discuss with your instructor, at a mutually agreed time – Whatsapp 442 461 9551
- Please post your presentations here in this folder
Rem Koolhaas – Dutch House
- Mention deconstruvist movement and research it.
- Very well presented, of lenses slected.
- Go deeper in the theories of Rem
- Use bibliography from the Library / books
Paul Rudolph – Yale school of Art
- Very good presentation, well researched concepts of Rudolph
- Add bibliography
- Use references and state his themes clearly
- is there a master and slave relationship?
Toyo Ito – Tama Art museum
- Look at Kochuu the movie for getting Ito`s Concepts
- There is no grid, forced asymetry
- Engawa – from Japanese architecture- Is that concept here?
- What other traditional Japanese architecture principles are used here? where does he diverge?
- What is the poetry of light here?
Tatiana Bilbao – Funeraria Tangassi
- Look at similarity with Brion tomb
- Regionalizing this idea of a tomb
- Whats the significance of a pink gemstone?